"The CBI said it is also investigating "inaction, selective action, police and chit fund nexus". The Centre had dubbed the ill-treatment of CBI officials an indication of "constitutional breakdown".
The dramatic developments on Sunday evening led to Ms Banerjee launching a sit-in that ended on Tuesday. The conduct of Mr Kumar and the State of West Bengal amounted to contempt of the Supreme Court judgment.Within hours of the three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, offering Mr Kumar protection against arrest, the beleaguered IPS officer wrote a letter to the CBI informing it that he will meet investigators in Shillong on February 8. the CBI sought access to Kolkata police chief, who is at the heart of a huge showdown between the CBI and West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, for questioning and accused him of attempts to shield suspects, including leaders of the ruling Trinamul Congress, in the multi-crore chit fund scams by "doctoring" phone call records, tampering with the electronic evidence and taking selective action against culprits. The SIT used to shield selective companies such as Sharadha, Rose Valley and Tower Group, which have given huge contributions (even by way of cheques) to the party in power in West Bengal."The CBI affidavit said "such actions which were on a public display throughout the country tantamount to nothing less than an armed rebellion against the Central government and the Central agencies.Earlier, Mr Venugopal submitted that the state police was not co-operating with the probe. "We had serious doubts over the documents which were handed over to us..Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for West Bengal government refuted the submissions, saying that the whole episode on Sunday was enacted with the object of harassment and humiliation. There is a serious breakdown of legal machinery and law and order in West Benga," he said. Venugopal, who maintained that a contempt of court has been committed by preventing CBI officers from exercising their duties, the Bench issued notices to West Bengal chief secretary and director general of police seeking their responses by February 18. "I have videos of the episode," he added.The apex court Bench, including Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjeev Khanna, also issued a notice to Mr Kumar and sought his response before February 20, the next date of hearing, on the CBI’s allegation that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by him provided the agency with doctored materials at the time of handing over the probe into the scams.During the hearing.Earlier, while observing that there is "no reason why he (Kumar) will not make himself available for the investigation," Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said, "We make it clear that nocoercive steps including arrest shall be taken against the commissioner of police.
The AG along with solicitor general Tushar Mehta said, "Can state police confront Centre’s police which is acting pursuant to the orders of this court? Your lordships have to issue notice for contempt and also lay down the law in this regard.The Bench made it clear that on consideration of their replies, the court may require the personal presence of the three officers on February 20 and the Secretary General of the court would intimate this to them on February 19. Call data, which was given to us, was incomplete.The CBI went to the Supreme Court on Monday, after its team that arrived at Kolkata https://www.weifengmachinery.com/ police chief’s home was blocked by police, bundled into buses and detained for a few hours.He said that there is no non-cooperation on the part of West Bengal, and that if the CBI had a problem, they should go to the Calcutta high court. Kolkata police commissioner tampered with material related to the chit fund scams and primary evidence in the form of CDRs. He also submitted that the CBI officers were neither arrested nor detained. Citing instances, he said the material handed over to the CBI was not the entire material.New Delhi: Putting to rest the simmering controversy for now, the Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Kolkata police commissioner Rajeev Kumar to appear before the CBI in Shillong, a neutral place outside West Bengal, for facing questions on Saradha scam while making it clear that he will not be arrested.

However, despite the steps taken, the problem still subsists. For offences under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 or other applicable laws but it does not see any difficulty why such economic incentives should not be duly planned or executed.New Delhi: The National Green Tribunal on Monday said there was a need to find out a long-lasting solution to the problems of stubble burning and directed the chief secretaries of four states to appear before it to explain ways to prevent it.
The green panel said it is open to the central government also to organise a meeting on the subject on the same day or any other convenient day.The tribunal said the government came out with a scheme called the "National Policy for Management of Crop Residue — 2014" which provided assistance to farmers by way of machinery and equipments to avoid stubble burning..It said that it was not considering the issue of adverse coercive measures like prosecution etc."The fact remains that the problem has not been fully tackled and the adverse impacts on the air quality and consequent impacts on the citizens’ health and lives are undisputed. https://www.weifengmachinery.com/product/accessories/cylinder-bolck.html We have perused the affidavits and reports from Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, NCT of Delhi and also reports of the ministry of agriculture, Government of India.
The problem is required to be resolved by taking all such measures as are possible in the interest of public health and environment protection," the bench said."We make it clear that we do not intend to criticise the working of any of the states or the central government.A bench, headed by NGT chairperson Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel, directed the Union agriculture secretary and chief secretaries of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi to remain present on November 15 after applying due diligence and strategic planning for action to prevent crop burning.

One rule says: "Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or appears to arise, between their public duties and their private interests; ministers should avoid accepting any gift or hospitality which might, or might reasonably appear to, compromise their judgement or place them under an improper obligation; ministers must keep separate their roles as minister and constituency or regional members; ministers must not use government resources for party-political purpose. The rules should forbid ministers from collecting funds completely.
A code of conduct cannot be a cure-all. They must uphold the political impartiality of the Civil Service and not ask civil servants to act in any way which would conflict with the Civil Service Code. This is subject to a condition: there must be an effective machinery for its observance and a credibly deterrent punishment for its violations. Extreme reactions distort calm public discussion of important issues of policy. They draw reactions ranging from sneer to reverence, as if a code would be a panacea for all ills.In contrast, in the House of Commons in 1952, Winston Churchill revealed detailed and precise rules that would govern a person’s relations, on appointment as minister, with his business, whether as proprietor, partner or director in a company.The commissioners have powers of investigation and may recommend redress.In 1992, the John Major government published a more detailed document on "questions of procedure". Little or no reform can be expected in a society that is polarised and where political morality is absent. This code is devoid of legality and morality.By arrangement with Dawn. This ridiculous code ends by making the Prime Minister "the authority for ensuring the observance" of it.Every now and then one is treated to clamours for codes of conduct in various fields of governance."At a time when civil servants are under pressure from ministers to act as their political aides, the Civil Service Code acquires added relevance. In the case of a chief minister, the Prime Minister would act in concert with the union home minister; in the case of a state minister, the "authority" would be the home minister and chief minister.Laws, rules and conventions spring from the society that they seek to govern. Nonetheless, a code of conduct is not only desirable but indispensable in areas where the rules are unclear or nonexistent. He should, however, ensure that such contributions are sent to a specified office bearer, etc of the society or body or institution or party concerned and not to him. If any purse or cheque intended for a registered society, or a charitable body, or an institution recognised by a public authority, or a political party is presented to him, he should pass it on as soon as possible to the organisation for which it is intended; and associate himself with the raising of funds except for the benefit of a registered society, or a charitable body, or an institution recognised by a public authority and a political party."The draftsman surely knew, by 1964, that a minister enjoys a certain clout far in excess of what his counterpart in the West does.
They publish an annual report that gives a general account of appeals made to them under the code, and they may make special reports on appeals, eg, if the government should refuse to act on their recommendations. People fawn over him as he does over his Prime Minister.Shortly after Jawaharlal Nehru’s death in May 1964, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri published the Code of Conduct for Ministers that said: "No minister should personally, or through a member of his family, accept contributions for any purpose, whether political, charitable or otherwise. In 2005, it was revised and reissued as the Ministerial Code.What is the duty of a civil servant who becomes aware that ministers are concealing politically embarrassing facts from the public, or are misleading parliament and the public with false information, or are otherwise acting in a way that is constitutionally improper? He or she is required to act in accordance with the Civil Service Code; first, bringing his or her concerns to the attention of senior officers within the department and, if this should not resolve the matter, reporting to the Civil Service commissioners. President Donald Trump freely violates more than one code. Which Prime Minister would pull up his minister for collecting funds for the party to which they belong? The authority vested in a politician has been used for political ends.Federalism was deformed by Prime Ministers to control https://www.weifengmachinery.com/ chief ministers in the opposition. Crimes continue to be committed despite the existence of a penal code on the statute book.